Kent Harrington
Kent is a videographer and professional storyteller. He regularly blogs for AIChE on ChEnected. See his latest posts below. You can also follow Kent on twitter @harringtonkent.

Eagle Ford drought
When Lestz later joined the company in 2010 as chief technology officer, most shale gas drillers in the Barnett Shale near Fort Worth still disposed of fracking wastewater by injecting it deep underground. And drilling in the Eagle Ford Shale of West Texas was just starting to take off. As the Eagle Ford continues to suffer from a prolonged drought (see animation), traditional
Texans choose between fracking and farming
Compared to thirsty, water-guzzling cities and farming, the amount of water needed to develop oil and gas wells is miniscule. The Wall Street Journal obtained a Texas Water Report that said 56% of water in Texas goes to farming; 26.9% to city water systems; 9.6% to manufacturing, including refineries; 4.1% to power generation; 1.8% for livestock; and 1.6% to mining, which includes oil-and-gas drilling. But with the local Carrizo and Gulf Coast aquifers already under pressure to meet the competing needs of farming and rapidly growing cities, fracking is drawing water from a severely limited resource. Darrell Brownlow, a West Texas cattle rancher, told the Journal that if the
The GASFRAC choice
Robert Lestz doesn't think Texans have to choose between fracking and farming. The GASFRAC closed-loop system offers a productive alternative (listen to an interview with Robert Lestz). Instead of water, GASFRAC relies on a thick propane gel. Then, like water, the propane gel is pumped deep into shale formations, carrying small sand particles that are forced into cracks to hold them open so the gas can flow out. But unlike water, the gel reverts to vapor before returning to the surface - along with the natural gas. As an added benefit, the returning propane does not carry drilling chemicals back to the surface. Watch a gelling demonstration: http://vimeo.com/25013243 Lestz also said propane fracking is more efficient because it allows more gas to flow from wells than water-based fracturing. After each frack, all the propane leaves the fractured rocks, unlike water, which can remain behind, partially blocking gas movement up the well. Lestz spoke to patexia.com, "Operators are recognizing an increase in reserve recoveries of 25% with
Cost and safety concerns
Propane, however, still costs more initially. It is also explosive, and requires special equipment to be handled properly and reduce risk. In January, there was a flash fire at an LPG gas well being drilled in Alberta by Husky Energy (news story), one of Canada's largest energy companies and one of the first to embrace LPG drilling. Three workers suffered burns, although no injuries were life threatening. Lestz said the company has added more monitoring equipment to reduce the risks. Wells now have 20 propane sensors, up from three, as well as an infrared video monitor that allows gas leaks to be seen by well crews never allowed near the "hot zone" during propane fracking.BlackBrush Oil and Gas chooses GASFRAC
Back in water-stressed Texas, GASFRAC has just entered into a two year contract with early adopter BlackBrush Oil and Gas (read article). After several test wells showed positive
Can GASFRAC change an entire industry?
Images: Drought map, National Drought Mitigation Center; longhorn. Texas Parks and Wildlife; rig Chesapeake Energy; various, GASFRAC
Comments
This is a fantastic article. Yes, I think this will transform fracking. Setting aside the economic and technical issues, policy makers want a none-water based solution because voters are 'pulling' for a environmentally sound alternative to water based fracking. This also plays into other chemical markets that will 'push' this solution. Having headwinds favoring both sides, I would think this would gain a lot of traction.
- Log in to post comments